|
Changes
in external factors such as wind and stack effect necessitate active
control, even on constant volume systems. 1, 3 This is often overlooked
by engineers and building maintenance supervisors, which generally
rely on air balance measurements that at best assure proper airflow
rates only at set up. As a result, systems that appear to be functioning
properly may not operate properly at a later date. Control schemes
that only modulate the outside air intake damper generally can not
overcome the negative pressure induced by cross winds and/or changes
in stack effect. 1, 2, 3 . By placing an airflow measuring station
on the outdoor air intake of these smaller systems, the direct measurement
and control of outside air intake flow rates will also help to assure
compliance with ASHRAE Standard 62-1999, Ventilation for Acceptable
Indoor Air Quality. 26
SYSTEMS
WITH RETURN OR RELIEF FANS
Large air handling systems having either a return or a relief fan
should ideally be setup to maintain a volumetric differential between
the intake and relief airflow rates. Systems that have intake systems
designed for airflow measurement, and also have adequate duct systems
on the relief system, can maintain building pressurization while
simultaneously assuring compliance with minimum outside air intake
ventilation rates. Provision for conditions that allow the proper
application of instrumentation will maximize the flexibility and
efficiency of your HVAC system, when the ABS controls have valid
inputs to work with.
Unfortunately,
the typical outside air intake on a system with an economizer cycle
is not usually designed for proper control of intake flow rates.
Dampers are generally sized to turn down to very low velocities
(< 100 fpm). Even though some airflow stations, such as those
using thermal dispersion (TD) techniques, can accurately measure
these low velocities 1, 2, 3 , the angular position of the damper
blades at maximum turndown often results in a situation which is
difficult, if not impossible, to control adequately.27, 28 Transient
wind effects can also adversely affect control stability.1, 3
An
additional complication results from the lack of adequate space
for airflow measurement in the relief air system. As with supply
fan-only systems, the initial air balancing only assures proper
operation at the time of balancing.1, 3 The dynamic nature of the
economizer cycle adds to additional tracking errors and hence, lack
of pressure control.

Figure #7 - Control Equivalents
If
both the total outside air and relief air flow rates can not be
measured, an alternate method for building pressure control must
be used. Figure #7 shows the mathematical relationships and the
equivalent for pressure tracking in systems with exhaust at the
air handler. Controlling return or relief fans to maintain a differential
between the supply air and return air flow rates into the building
will achieve the same result as maintaining the differential between
the outside air and relief air flow rates.
<Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
Next>
|